Syllabus for Creating Web
Pages I Teaching with Interactive Web Pages
Course Number: EDU 67109-01 (3)
Dates: Saturdays:
September 8, 15, 29, October 6, 13, 27, 8:00am – 1:30pm
Credit Hours:
3
Session: Fall
2001
Location: Ottawa University, Phoenix Center,
2340 W. Mission Lane
Attendance: Attendance is mandatory at all class sessions.
Instructor: Michael Mann, teacherz@earthlink.net, (480) 423-1735
Course
Description:
Learn to create a web page using MS FrontPage. Use web page to teach K-12 students. Create interactive games and other learning activities. Design your project to meet the educational needs of your classroom!
Course
Prerequisites:
No prerequisites, though basic Internet experience is recommended.
Course
Objectives:
Upon completion of this course, participants will be able to:
· Design and create multiple web pages that support his/her teaching responsibilities.
· Design Web Quest activities to be used in their classroom.
· Upload and update web pages to a web server.
Course
Methods and Procedures:
Direct instruction, examples, modeling, guided practice and independent practice will be used to reinforce skills presented.
Course
Outline:
|
· Create
interactive games · Post
Web quest to internet
|
Course
Materials:
All necessary course material is posted online at: www.teacherz.net/ottawa
Students will also need one 3-˝ inch floppy disk
Evaluation:
Students will be evaluated based on participation and completion of the in-class assignments as well as an outside project. A second Web Quest or similar interactive project using the Internet will be due three weeks after the course completion. This Web Quest or interactive project should reflect a minimum of 15 outside hours of work.
Outside
Project:
All students is to develop a “long-term” WebQuest (using
FrontPage 2000). A “long-term” WebQuest is one that will take the student
approximately 5-10 class periods to complete.
If you are able to post your finished WebQuest to the web, email the
instructor the address to your web site.
If you are not able to post your WebQuest on the web, email completed
project as an attachment to the instructor. The outside project
is a requirement described on page 7 of the Ottawa University catalog.
Student
Handbook/Catalog:
Participants should refer to the Ottawa University Student Handbook for all University Regulations.
Disclaimer:
Course content and schedule may vary from this outline to meet the needs of a particular group of participants. The instructor will explain the rationale for any variance as it occurs.
EVALUATION
·
The attached rubric will be used to evaluate student
success on all projects created for this class. Rubric scores will be determined through successful completion of
the in class project as well as the outside project. Percentages obtained from
the rubric assessment will be applied to a grade using the following scale.
|
A |
90-100% |
|
B |
80-89% |
|
C |
70-79% |
|
D |
60-69% |
|
F |
0-59% |
Teaching with Interactive Web Pages: EDU 67109-01 (3)
Evaluation Rubric
Student:__________________________________________ Date:________________
|
|
Beginning |
Developing |
Accomplished |
Score |
|
Overall Aesthetics (This
refers to the WebQuest page itself, not the external resources linked to it.) |
||||
|
Overall visual appeal |
0 points Background is gray. There are few or
no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography. |
1 point There are a few graphic elements.
There is some variation in type size, color, and layout. |
2 points Appealing graphic elements are
included appropriately. Differences in type size and/or color are used
well. |
|
|
Introduction |
||||
|
Motivational effectiveness of Introduction |
0 points Introduction is purely factual, with
no appeal to relevance or social importance. |
1 point Introduction relates somewhat to the
learner's interests and/or describes a compelling question or problem. |
2 points The Introduction draws the reader
into the lesson by relating to the learner's interests or goals and/or
engagingly describing a compelling question or problem. |
|
|
Cognitive effectiveness of the Introduction |
0 points Introduction doesn't prepare the
reader for what is to come, or build on what the learner already knows. |
1 point Introduction makes some reference to
learner's prior knowledge and previews to some extent what the lesson is
about. |
2 points The Introduction builds on learner's
prior knowledge by explicitly mentioning important concepts or principles,
and effectively prepares the learner for the lesson by foreshadowing new
concepts and principles. |
|
|
Task (The
task is the end result of student efforts... not the steps involved in
getting there.) |
||||
|
Cognitive level of the task |
0 points Task requires simply comprehending
web pages and answering questions. |
3 points Task requires analysis of information
and/or putting together information from several sources. |
6 points Task requires synthesis of multiple
sources of information, and/or taking a position, and/or going beyond the
data given and making a generalization or creative product. |
|
|
Technical sophistication of task |
0 points Task requires simple verbal or
written response. |
1 point Task requires use of word processing
or simple presentation software. |
2 points Task requires use of multimedia
software, video, or conferencing. |
|
|
Process (The
process is the step-by-step description of how students will accomplish the
task.) |
||||
|
Clarity of Process |
0 points Process is not clearly stated.
Students would not know exactly what they were supposed to do just from reading
this. |
1 point Some directions are given, but there
is missing information. Students might be confused. |
2 points Every step is clearly stated. Most
students would know exactly where they were in the process and what to do
next. |
|
|
Richness of process |
0 points Few steps, no separate roles
assigned. |
3 points Some separate tasks or roles
assigned. More complex activities required. |
6 points Lots of variety in the activities
performed. Different roles and perspectives are taken. |
|
|
Resources |
||||
|
Quantity of resources |
0 points Few online resources used. |
1 point Moderate number of resources used. |
2 points Many resources provided, including
off-line resources. |
|
|
Quality of resources |
0 points Links are mundane. They lead to
information that could be found in a classroom encyclopedia. |
2 points Some links carry information not
ordinarily found in a classroom. |
4 points Links make excellent use of the
Web's timeliness and colorfulness. |
|
|
Evaluation |
||||
|
Clarity of Evaluation Criteria |
0 points Students have no idea on how they'll
be judged. |
1 point Criteria for success are at least
partially described. |
2 points Criteria for gradations of success are
clearly stated, perhaps in the form of a rubric for self-, peer-, or teacher
use. |
|
|
Unit Length |
0 points Completion of WebQuest will take 0-1 class periods. |
4 points Completion of WebQuest will take 2-3 class periods. |
10 points Completion of WebQuest will take at least 5 – class
periods. |
|
|
Total Score |
/40 |
|||